Progress report on chaos, FFT, and origins of irregular satellites

The objectif of this work is to retrieve the first frequency associated with the librating oscillations in \omega of satellites trapped in the Kozai resonance.  This web-page is intended as a summary of the work done on this subject.   By all means, it is not supposed to be a rigorous work on the subject.  At the moment it is so divided:
 

  1. Some facts about FFT
  2. Tests results
  3. Applications to S2000/S5, S6, S2, and S3
  4. Choosing Sampling time and number of data points
  5. Filtered elements
  6. Determining the transition between circulating and librating orbits
  7. S2000/S5: limits of the libration island and an application of the frequency analysis method
  8. New simulations: initial conditions
  9. S/2001J10
  10. S/2001J10: Results
  11. An application of the median filter
  12. Low-resolution survey: results
  13. Gas-Drag: Reynolds numbers
  14. Gas-Drag: Stokes-drag regime
  15. Gas-Drag: Gas-drag regime
  16. Gas-Drag and Kozai resonance
  17. Adiabatic Invariant
  18. Chaos: possible causes
  19. Bretagnon model
  20. Lyapunov exponents
  21. Causes of chaos: an application of the Bretagnon model
  22. Resonances
  23. New set of initial conditions, e vs. \Theta.
  24. Resonances locations in frequency space
  25. Secondary resonances around the Kozai resonance

 

Some facts about FFT

These are just some simple facts about Fourier transform.
 


         (1) f=360*3600/P(yr)
 

         (2) fN=1/2*(\Delta T)

            With \Delta T the sampling time.    As  an example, with a sampling time of 1000 years, the maximum frequency retrievable would be of:

                                   fN=(360*3600)/(2*1000) = 648 "/yr.

            Higher frequencies are not completely lost.   Given a frequency at fN+\Delta f, the FFT would retrieve it and alias it as a lower frequency at fN-\Delta f.
         That is the reason why we want to consider using orbital elements filtered with a low-pass filter...
 

        (3)  \Delta f=1/(Npoints*\Delta T)
 

         In our case:

           \Delta f=(360*3600)/(32768*1000)=0.03955"/yr

Tests results.

To check my code I have run three tests.   First, I have generated a fake signal mimicking the behavior of e*exp(i\varpi) for Ceres (i.e., I generated a file with time, e*cos(\varpi), e*sin(\varpi)).  I used the values of the first 10 frequencies, amplitudes, and phases as in Sidlichovsky and Nesvorny (1997).    These values are reported in the following table:
 
 

e*exp(i\varpi) decomposition: 1 Ceres: fake case
 
Frequency ("/yr)
Amplitude
Phase (degrees)
     
 54.07464 
 0.115573 
 152.273
4.24465 
0.030770
29.497
28.23318
0.019704
300.863
52.23318 0.008700
32.124
-172.28929
0.003359
226.036
53.39115
0.001435
302.504
-174.13056
0.001307
105.332
3.08658
0.001257
119.333
55.91697
0.001077
272.615
-170.44725
0.001077
165.590

In the figure there are the results of the analysis of the fake signal with my code.  The data sampling was of 120,000 days (328.549011 yrs) and I used 32768 data points.  As can be seen, the code does a good job in retrieving all the 10 frequencies, and preserve the ratio among amplitudes.

The next logical step was to check how the code performed on the output of a real integration.  I therefore integrated 1 Ceres, 2 Pallas, and 4 Vesta under the influence of the 4 giant planets with SWIFT_WHM and checked if I were able to retrieve the frequencies found by Sidlichovsky and Nesvorny 1997 for a similar integration.  I output both e*exp(\varpi) and sin(I/2)*exp(\Omega), made the FFT and confronted the results with those found by Sidlichovsky and Nesvorny 1997 (10  frequencies for 1 Ceres, first frequency for 2 Pallas and 4 Vesta).  In the following table I report the first 10 frequencies from the decomposition of sin(I/2)*exp(\Omega) as from Sidlichovsky and Nesvorny 1997, while the figure shows my  results.   The next two figures show my results for the analysis of e*exp(\varpi)  for 1 Ceres, and 4 Vesta.    In all the considered cases there was good agreement with the published values.
 
 

sin(I/2)*exp(\Omega) decomposition: 1 Ceres


Frequency ("/yr)
Amplitude
Phase (degrees)
     
 -59.10736 
 0.080378
 99.223
-60.94878
0.014701
338.786
-57.26561
0.014650
39.140
-0.00001 0.013683
107.648
-58.42389
0.008938
129.248
-59.79006
0.008786
248.077
-26.33878
0.005271
313.763
-57.95748
0.001899
201.575
-61.62944
0.001780
124.544
-56.57933
0.001459
64.909

 
 
e*exp(i\varpi) decomposition: 1 Ceres

e*exp(i\varpi) decomposition: 4 Vesta

The conclusion is that the code does a good job in retrieving the main frequency.  Therefore it can be used to obtain an estimate of chaotic diffusion as in Robutel and Laskar 2001:

(4)         \sigma=1-f(2)/f(1)

Where f(1) is the frequency determined in the first interval, and f(2)is the frequency determined in the second interval.   But we should be aware that the precision with which the exact value of the amplitude is retrieved depends on the resolution (i.e., the number of data points used).   This may be a problem if we want to use Mitchencko and Ferraz-Mello Spectral Analysis Method.    But, overall, it looks very promising...


Applications to S/2000S5, S6, S2, and S3

I performed an integration with the four giant planets and four irregular satellites: S/2000S5, S6, S2, and S3.   The integration length was 100 Myr, and the time step was of 1000 yrs (which means a Nyquist frequency of 648 "/yr).  Once again, I have used 32768 data points, that gives a resolution of 0.03955"/yr.   The first figure reports the FFT of e*exp(\varpi) for the case of S/2000S5, the second a blow-up of the region between -100 and 100 "/yr (where the planetary frequencies are suppose to be found), and the third figure the output of the fmft code of Nesvorny', used to retrieve the first 20 frequencies in the same interval -100-100 "/yr.  There is a very good agreement between the second and third figure.   The orbital elements used for this computation were output referred to the fixed ecliptical plane of the Earth.
 

The next three figures report analogous results for S/2000S6, S2, S3.
 

Since in this work we are particularly interested in studying the behavior of the two Kozai resonators, D. Nesvorny' suggested to use e*exp(\omega) for the cases of S/2000S5 and S6, and predicted that their spectra should be dominated by the frequency associated with the libration in \omega. The next two figures reports the FFT of e*exp(\omega) for these two satellites.  Also in this case, the elements are referred to the ecliptical plane of the Earth.
 

The previous figures were obtained using orbital elements referred to the initial ecliptical plane of the Earth.  However, quantities like the inclination and \Omega should be computed with respect to the Laplace plane of Saturn, which at that distances from the planet corresponds to the instantenous ecliptical plane of the planet.  We generated element referred to to this plane for the four integrated satellites and then applied the FFT to these new elements.

In the following two figure I show the results of the FFT of e*exp(\varpi) for the case of S/2000S5, with a blow-up of the region where the planetary frequencies are located.   Results for S/2000S6, S2, and S3 follows.  Note the differences with the previous cases where the element referred to the ecliptical plane of the Earth were used.
 

 

Finally, we report the spectra of e*exp(\omega) for the cases of S/2000S5 and S6, computed using the element referred to the instanteneous ecliptical plane of Saturn.  As expected, they are identical to those obtained for the case of Earth's ecliptical plane.